Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Breeding bird territory placement in riparian wet meadows in relation to invasive reed canary grass, Phalaris arundinacea

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invasive plants are a growing concern worldwide for conservation of native habitats. In endangered wet meadow habitat in the Upper Midwestern United States, reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) is a recognized problem and its prevalence is more widespread than the better-known invasive wetland plant purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Although resource managers are concerned about the effect of reed canary grass on birds, this is the first study to report how common wet meadow birds use habitat in relation to reed canary grass cover and dominance. We examined three response variables: territory placement, size of territories, and numbers of territories per plot in relation to cover of reed canary grass. Territory locations for Sedge Wren (Cistothorus platensis) and Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodid) were positively associated with reed canary grass cover, while those for Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas) were not. Only Swamp Sparrow (M. georgiana) territory locations were negatively associated with reed canary grass cover and dominance (which indicated a tendency to place territories where there was no reed canary grass or where many plant species occurred with reed canary grass). Swamp Sparrow territories were positively associated with vegetation height density and litter depth. Common Yellowthroat territories were positively associated with vegetation height density and shrub cover. Song Sparrow territories were negatively associated with litter depth. Reed canary grass cover within territories was not associated with territory size for any of these four bird species. Territory density per plot was not associated with average reed canary grass cover of plots for all four species. Sedge Wrens and Song Sparrows may not respond negatively to reed canary grass because this grass is native to wet meadows of North America, and in the study area it merely replaces other tall lush plants. Avoidance of reed canary grass by Swamp Sparrows may be mediated through their preference for wet areas where reed canary grass typically does not dominate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. p. 267–81. In B. N. Petrov and F. Csáki (eds.) 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, W. J. 1999. The rapid growth of a population of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and its impact on some riverbottom herbs. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 126: 133–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, L. K. and R. A. Askins. 1999. Impact of the spread of Phragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut tidal marshes. Wetlands 19: 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, T. J. 2003. Breeding bird, plant, and arthropod responses to restoration and management of riparian conservation easements in the Iowa River corridor, east-central Iowa. M.S. Thesis. Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernthal, T. W. and K. G. Willis. 2004. Using Landsat 7 imagery to map invasive reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea): a landscape level wetland monitoring methodology. Final Report to U.S. EPA-Region V, Wetland Grant #CD975115-01-0

  • Bibby, C. J., N. D. Burgess, and D. A. Hill. 1997. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter, G. F. 1996. Geographic Information System for Geoscientist — Modeling with GIS. Elsevier, Tarrytown, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, G. G. and L. B. Best. 1991. Bird abundance and species richness in grassed waterways in Iowa row-crop fields. American Midland Naturalist 126: 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P. and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, M. and L. B. Best. 1994. Nest density and nesting success of birds in roadsides adjacent to rowcrop fields. American Midland Naturalist 131: 347–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, T. S. and H. H. Iltis. 2000. Atlas of Wisconsin Prairie and Savanna Flora. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin 191, Madison, WI, USA.

  • Curtis, J. T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark, K. E. and H. G. Merriam. 1986. Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments. Biological Conservation 36: 115–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S. D. 1972. Populations in a Seasonal Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S. D. and H. L. Lucas, Jr. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds: I. Theoretical development. Animal Behavior 19: 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch, S. M., N. O. Anderson, and P. D. Ascher. 1999. Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19: 733–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. K. and S. M. Galatowitsch. 2002. Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on the establishment of wetland plant communities. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 134–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, R. 1988. Water as a habitat cue for breeding Swamp and Song Sparrows. Condor 90: 420–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groshek, A. 2000. Grappling with the green giant. Wisconsin Natural Resources 24(4): 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzy, M. J. and G. Ritchison. 1999. Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). In A. Poole and F. Gills (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 448. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R., D. E. Kroodsma, and J. P. Gibbs. 2001. Sedge Wren (Cistothorus platensis). In A. Poole and F. Gill (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 582. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. M. and D. Sample. 1988. Birds of wet-mesic and wet prairies in Wisconsin. Passenger Pigeon 50: 143–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. M. and D. Sample. 1995. Grassland communities. p. 118–29. In Wisconsin’s Biodiversity as a Management Issue. A report to Department of Natural Resource Managers (May 1995), prepared by J. Addis, E. Eckstein, A. Forbes, D Gebken, R. Henderson, J. Kotar, B. Les, P. Matthiae, W. McCown, S. Miller, B. Moss, D. Sample, M. Staggs, and K. Visser, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K., J. M. Ver Hoef, K. Krivoruchko, and N. Lucas. 2001. Using ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, M. K., G. Butcher, J. Fitzgerald, and J. Shieldcastle. 2001. Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan for the Upper Great Lakes Plain (Physiographic Area 16). USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center in cooperation with Partners in Flight. La Crosse, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, O. and J. Lindström. 2001. Habitat heterogeneity affects population growth in goshawk Accipiter gentiles. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 173–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, C., C. Dufresne, and F. Delisle. 2005. The spread of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) in Quebec: a spatio-temporal perspective. Ecoscience 12: 366–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, K. Y. and S. L. Zeger. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73: 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. D. and T. E. Martin. 2005. Reproductive success of Chestnut-collared Longspurs in native and exotic grassland. Condor 107: 363–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G. C. 1985. Reed canary grass. p. 207–16. In M. E. Heath (ed.) Forages, the Science of Grassland Agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, D. A., R. Lindig-Cisneros, J. Werner, S. Kercher, R. Miller, and J. B. Zedler. 2003. The replacement of wetland vegetation by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Ecological Restoration 21: 116–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, M. S. 2004. Effects of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) on terrestrial arthropod biomass, abundance and diversity in Upper Midwestern riparian wet meadows. M.A. Thesis. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merigliano, M. F. and P. Lesica. 1998. The native status of Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the inland Northwest, USA. Natural Areas Journal 18: 223–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota County Biological Survey. 1996a. Natural communities and rare species of Winona County, Minnesota. Minnes sota County Biological Survey Map Series number 11. Minneseota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota County Biological Survey. 1996b. Natural communities and rare species of Winona County, Minnesota. Minnesota County Biological Survey Map Series number 11. Minneseota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moré, J. J. and D. C. Sorensen. 1983. Computing a trust-region step. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 4: 553–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossman, M. J. and D. W. Sample. 1990. Birds of Wisconsin sedge meadows. Passenger Pigeon 52: 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, T. B. 1997. Swamp Sparrow (Melospiza georgiana). In A. Poole and F. Gills (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 279. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and the American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F., E. T. La Roe, and J. M. Scott. 1995. Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paveglio, F. L. and K. M. Kilbride. 2000. Response of vegetation to control of reed canarygrass in seasonally managed wetlands of southwestern Washington. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 730–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, J. C. and D. M. Bates. 1995. Approximations to the loglikelihood function in the 291 nonlinear mixed-effects model. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 4: 12–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poptnik, G. J. and W. M. Giuliano. 2000. Response of birds to grazing or riparian zones. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 976–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, R. B. and C. A. Ribic. 2001. Grassland birds associated with agricultural riparian practices in southwestern Wisconsin. Journal of Range Management 54: 546–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, D. D. 1986. Sedge meadows of the upper Midwest: a stewardship summary. Natural Areas Journal 6: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rising, J. D. 1996. A Guide to the Identification and Natural History of the Sparrows of the United States and Canada. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robel, R. J., J. N. Briggs, A. D. Dayton, and L. C. Hulbert. 1970. Relationships between visual obstruction measurement and weight of grassland vegetation. Journal of Range Management 23: 295–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, F. and F. Knopf. 1994. Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44: 418–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 2003. SAS OnlineDoc, Version 9. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer, M. A., M. C. Runge, and P. W. Sherman. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 474–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springman, R. E., D. C. Payer, and B. J. Holmes. [online]. 1995. Pollution control guide for milking center wastewater management. Cooperative Extension Services, North Central Region Extension Publication number 549. (http://cecommerce.uwex.edu/pdfs/NCR549.PDF).

  • Steinauer, G. 1999. Exotic plants in Sandhills wet meadows. NEBRASKAland 78: 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, B. L., S. R. Orman, and J. W. Ozard. 1988. Response of Least Bitterns to tape recorded calls. Wilson Bulletin 100: 496–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. L. and E. J. Taylor. 1990. Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. Journal of Wildlife Management 54: 322–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Fish and wildlife resource conservation priorities, Region 3, version 2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, MN, USA.(http://www.fws.gov/midwest/News/documents/priority.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L., Jr., and J. V. Wells. 1992. Use of a new reproductive index to evaluate relationship between habitat quality and breeding success. Auk 109: 679–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volesky, J. 1998. Subirrigated meadow management practices. Institute of Agricultural and Natural Resources 4: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, M. B., H. H. Prince, and R. R. Cox. 1999. Avian use of purple loosestrife dominated habitat relative to other vegetation types in a Lake Huron wetland complex. Wilson Bulletin 111: 105–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1974. Habitat heterogeneity and avian community structure in North American grasslands. American Midland Naturalist 91: 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. and J. T. Rotenberry. 1979. Diet niche relationships among North American grassland and shrubsteppe birds. Oecologia 42: 253–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witham, J. W. and A. J. Kimball. 1996. Use of a geographic information system to facilitate analysis of spot-mapping data. Journal of Field Ornithology 67: 367–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasukawa, H. and W. A. Searcy. 1995. Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). In A. Poole and F. Gill (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 184. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, 2630 Fanta Reed Road, 54603, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA

    Eileen M. Kirsch, Brian R. Gray, Timothy J. Fox & Wayne E. Thogmartin

Authors
  1. Eileen M. Kirsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian R. Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Timothy J. Fox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wayne E. Thogmartin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eileen M. Kirsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirsch, E.M., Gray, B.R., Fox, T.J. et al. Breeding bird territory placement in riparian wet meadows in relation to invasive reed canary grass, Phalaris arundinacea . Wetlands 27, 644–655 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[644:BBTPIR]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[644:BBTPIR]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Search

Navigation